Logical Fallacy Bingo Logo

Naturalistic Fallacy
Chronological Snobbery
Fallacy of Many Questions
Straw man
Cherry Picking
Appeal to Ridicule
Appeal to Spite
Association Fallacy
Appeal to Flattery
Abusive Fallacy
Fallacy fallacy
Retrospective Determinism
Factually Inaccurate
(basically free)
Misleading Vividness
Overwhelming Exception
Appeal to Motive
Hasty Generalization
Historian's Fallacy
Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy
Appeal to Hypocrisy
Appeal to Tradition
Appeal to Novelty
Slippery Slope Fallacy
Appeal to Probability
Thought terminating cliche

Your Fallacies:
  1. Naturalistic Fallacy (wiki): Attempts to prove a claim about ethics by appealing to a definition of the term -good- in terms of either one or more claims about natural properties.
  2. Chronological Snobbery (wiki): Where a thesis is deemed incorrect because it was commonly held when something else, clearly false, was also commonly held.
  3. Fallacy of Many Questions (wiki): Someone asks a question that presupposes something that has not been proven or accepted by all the people involved (loaded question).
  4. Straw man (wiki): An argument based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position.
  5. Cherry Picking (wiki): Act of pointing at individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position, while ignoring a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position.
  6. Appeal to Ridicule (wiki): A specific type of appeal to emotion where an argument is made by presenting the opponent's argument in a way that makes it appear ridiculous.
  7. Appeal to Spite (wiki): A specific type of appeal to emotion where an argument is made through exploiting people's bitterness or spite towards an opposing party.
  8. Association Fallacy (wiki): Arguing that because two things share a property they are the same. Commonly guilt by association or honor by association.
  9. Appeal to Flattery (wiki): A specific type of appeal to emotion where an argument is made due to the use of flattery to gather support.
  10. Abusive Fallacy (wiki): A type of ad hominem when it turns into name-calling rather than arguing about the originally proposed argument.
  11. Fallacy fallacy (wiki): Assumes that if an argument for some conclusion is fallacious, then the conclusion itself is false.
  12. Retrospective Determinism (wiki): The argument that because some event has occurred, its occurrence must have been inevitable beforehand.
  13. Factually Inaccurate (basically free): That's not true.
  14. Misleading Vividness (wiki): Involves describing an occurrence in vivid detail, even if it is an exceptional occurrence, to convince someone that it is a problem.
  15. Overwhelming Exception (wiki): An accurate generalization that comes with qualifications which eliminate so many cases that what remains is much less impressive than the initial statement might have led one to assume.
  16. Appeal to Motive (wiki): Where a premise is dismissed by calling into question the motives of its proposer.
  17. Hasty Generalization (wiki): Basing a broad conclusion on a small sample.
  18. Historian's Fallacy (wiki): Occurs when one assumes that decision makers of the past viewed events from the same perspective and having the same information as those subsequently analyzing the decision.
  19. Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy (wiki): Improperly asserting a cause to explain a cluster of data that the larger data set does not support.
  20. Appeal to Hypocrisy (wiki): The argument states that a certain position is false or wrong and/or should be disregarded because its proponent fails to act consistently in accordance with that position.
  21. Appeal to Tradition (wiki): A conclusion supported solely because it has long been held to be true.
  22. Appeal to Novelty (wiki): Where a proposal is claimed to be superior or better solely because it is new or modern.
  23. Slippery Slope Fallacy (wiki): Asserting that a relatively small first step inevitably leads to a chain of related events culminating in some significant impact.
  24. Appeal to Probability (wiki): Assumes that because something is likely to happen, it is inevitable that it will happen.
  25. Thought terminating cliche (wiki): A commonly used phrase, sometimes passing as folk wisdom, used to quell cognitive dissonance, conceal lack of thought-entertainment, move onto other topics etc. but in any case, end the debate with a cliche, not a point.

Show All Fallacies
Generate a New Card