Logical Fallacy Bingo Logo

Fallacy fallacy
Straw man
Moving the Goalposts
Appeal to Consequences
Nirvana Fallacy
Appeal to Probability
Association Fallacy
Appeal to Ridicule
Appeal to Accomplishment
Poisoning the well
Special pleading
Appeal to Flattery
Dodge the question
(basically free)
Naturalistic Fallacy
Abusive Fallacy
Misleading Vividness
Argument from Silence
Appeal to Spite
Appeal to Hypocrisy
Fallacy of Many Questions
Appeal to Motive
Cherry Picking
Wishful Thinking
Historian's Fallacy
Argumentum ad Populum

Your Fallacies:
  1. Fallacy fallacy (wiki): Assumes that if an argument for some conclusion is fallacious, then the conclusion itself is false.
  2. Straw man (wiki): An argument based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position.
  3. Moving the Goalposts (wiki): Argument in which evidence presented in response to a specific claim is dismissed and some other (often greater) evidence is demanded.
  4. Appeal to Consequences (wiki): The conclusion is supported by a premise that asserts positive or negative consequences from some course of action (If P, then Q will occur. Q is desirable. Therefore, P is true. ).
  5. Nirvana Fallacy (wiki): When solutions to problems are rejected because they are not perfect.
  6. Appeal to Probability (wiki): Assumes that because something is likely to happen, it is inevitable that it will happen.
  7. Association Fallacy (wiki): Arguing that because two things share a property they are the same. Commonly guilt by association or honor by association.
  8. Appeal to Ridicule (wiki): A specific type of appeal to emotion where an argument is made by presenting the opponent's argument in a way that makes it appear ridiculous.
  9. Appeal to Accomplishment (wiki): Where an assertion is deemed true or false based on the accomplishments of the proposer.
  10. Poisoning the well (wiki): A type of ad hominem where adverse information about a target is presented with the intention of discrediting everything that the target person says.
  11. Special pleading (wiki): Where a proponent of a position attempts to cite something as an exemption to a generally accepted rule or principle without justifying the exemption (includes No True Scotsman).
  12. Appeal to Flattery (wiki): A specific type of appeal to emotion where an argument is made due to the use of flattery to gather support.
  13. Dodge the question (basically free): Lets talk about something else.
  14. Naturalistic Fallacy (wiki): Attempts to prove a claim about ethics by appealing to a definition of the term -good- in terms of either one or more claims about natural properties.
  15. Abusive Fallacy (wiki): A type of ad hominem when it turns into name-calling rather than arguing about the originally proposed argument.
  16. Misleading Vividness (wiki): Involves describing an occurrence in vivid detail, even if it is an exceptional occurrence, to convince someone that it is a problem.
  17. Argument from Silence (wiki): A conclusion based on silence or lack of contrary evidence (includes shifting the burden of proof).
  18. Appeal to Spite (wiki): A specific type of appeal to emotion where an argument is made through exploiting people's bitterness or spite towards an opposing party.
  19. Appeal to Hypocrisy (wiki): The argument states that a certain position is false or wrong and/or should be disregarded because its proponent fails to act consistently in accordance with that position.
  20. Fallacy of Many Questions (wiki): Someone asks a question that presupposes something that has not been proven or accepted by all the people involved (loaded question).
  21. Appeal to Motive (wiki): Where a premise is dismissed by calling into question the motives of its proposer.
  22. Cherry Picking (wiki): Act of pointing at individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position, while ignoring a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position.
  23. Wishful Thinking (wiki): A specific type of appeal to emotion where a decision is made according to what might be pleasing to imagine, rather than according to evidence or reason.
  24. Historian's Fallacy (wiki): Occurs when one assumes that decision makers of the past viewed events from the same perspective and having the same information as those subsequently analyzing the decision.
  25. Argumentum ad Populum (wiki): Where a proposition is claimed to be true or good solely because many people believe it to be so.

Show All Fallacies
Generate a New Card