Logical Fallacy Bingo Logo

Nirvana Fallacy
Appeal to Novelty
False Dilemma
Special pleading
Fallacy fallacy
Inconsistent Comparison
Association Fallacy
Historian's Fallacy
Ludic Fallacy
Appeal to Hypocrisy
Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy
Overwhelming Exception
Factually Inaccurate
(basically free)
Appeal to Motive
Appeal to Flattery
Genetic Fallacy
Abusive Fallacy
Appeal to Ridicule
Appeal to Tradition
Naturalistic Fallacy
Wishful Thinking
Appeal to Accomplishment
Appeal to Spite
Hasty Generalization
Misleading Vividness

Your Fallacies:
  1. Nirvana Fallacy (wiki): When solutions to problems are rejected because they are not perfect.
  2. Appeal to Novelty (wiki): Where a proposal is claimed to be superior or better solely because it is new or modern.
  3. False Dilemma (wiki): Two alternative statements are held to be the only possible options, when in reality there are more.
  4. Special pleading (wiki): Where a proponent of a position attempts to cite something as an exemption to a generally accepted rule or principle without justifying the exemption (includes No True Scotsman).
  5. Fallacy fallacy (wiki): Assumes that if an argument for some conclusion is fallacious, then the conclusion itself is false.
  6. Inconsistent Comparison (wiki): Where different methods of comparison are used, leaving one with a false impression of the whole comparison.
  7. Association Fallacy (wiki): Arguing that because two things share a property they are the same. Commonly guilt by association or honor by association.
  8. Historian's Fallacy (wiki): Occurs when one assumes that decision makers of the past viewed events from the same perspective and having the same information as those subsequently analyzing the decision.
  9. Ludic Fallacy (wiki): The belief that the outcomes of a non-regulated random occurrences can be encapsulated by a statistic; a failure to take into account unknown unknowns in determining the probability of an event's taking place.
  10. Appeal to Hypocrisy (wiki): The argument states that a certain position is false or wrong and/or should be disregarded because its proponent fails to act consistently in accordance with that position.
  11. Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy (wiki): Improperly asserting a cause to explain a cluster of data that the larger data set does not support.
  12. Overwhelming Exception (wiki): An accurate generalization that comes with qualifications which eliminate so many cases that what remains is much less impressive than the initial statement might have led one to assume.
  13. Factually Inaccurate (basically free): That's not true.
  14. Appeal to Motive (wiki): Where a premise is dismissed by calling into question the motives of its proposer.
  15. Appeal to Flattery (wiki): A specific type of appeal to emotion where an argument is made due to the use of flattery to gather support.
  16. Genetic Fallacy (wiki): Where a conclusion is suggested based solely on something or someone's origin rather than its current meaning or context.
  17. Abusive Fallacy (wiki): A type of ad hominem when it turns into name-calling rather than arguing about the originally proposed argument.
  18. Appeal to Ridicule (wiki): A specific type of appeal to emotion where an argument is made by presenting the opponent's argument in a way that makes it appear ridiculous.
  19. Appeal to Tradition (wiki): A conclusion supported solely because it has long been held to be true.
  20. Naturalistic Fallacy (wiki): Attempts to prove a claim about ethics by appealing to a definition of the term -good- in terms of either one or more claims about natural properties.
  21. Wishful Thinking (wiki): A specific type of appeal to emotion where a decision is made according to what might be pleasing to imagine, rather than according to evidence or reason.
  22. Appeal to Accomplishment (wiki): Where an assertion is deemed true or false based on the accomplishments of the proposer.
  23. Appeal to Spite (wiki): A specific type of appeal to emotion where an argument is made through exploiting people's bitterness or spite towards an opposing party.
  24. Hasty Generalization (wiki): Basing a broad conclusion on a small sample.
  25. Misleading Vividness (wiki): Involves describing an occurrence in vivid detail, even if it is an exceptional occurrence, to convince someone that it is a problem.

Show All Fallacies
Generate a New Card